I am a technology teacher at
Kaiapoi Borough School. I teach Creative Textiles 4 days a week and 1 day a
week in Robotics.
Defining my
‘Community of Practice’
This is hard to define because of the context I teach and the
eight contributing schools, the many students, colleagues and support staff.
They all form part of the COP as we ‘engage’ with them all to create the
best learning outcomes for students and the sense of ‘joint enterprise’
(Wenger, 2000). Students are at the forefront of our COP from the feedback we
receive from them and the fact we actually ‘learn’ from the students! They
provide valuable information that helps shape the learning programmes and to
provide a more purposeful learning experience. The contributing schools’
practices provide us with insights how we can improve and differentiate our
programmes to best suit the needs of their students. Our home school provides
opportunities for flexibility and professional development in other curriculum
areas. As a Technology team we are very strong on collaboration and share
our ideas that we receive from students, peers and schools.
Contributions to my community of
practice
I am constantly reflecting on my
practice, which has its ups and downs. However, both are shared with my team to
provide a new perspective. Often the positive experiences are taken up and used
by another team member – it may be just another way of teaching a concept or a
simple ‘circle time’ topic. The not so positive experiences actually end up
being a positive because the team learns from these too. If I have had a
session that has not gone to plan with a particular group some strategies may
be suggested and these may be adopted by another team member when they have a
similar experience.
I share my planning and programme
to my team which allows feedback to improve on the development of this and also
as a team we borrow each other’s ideas.
One of the most important
contributions to my community of practice is the students. I give the students
the opportunity to give me feedback at the end of the session: “How did I do?”
“What do I need to change?” The students are very forthcoming and provide
honest feedback, and sometimes it hurts. Alternatively, I might ask: “How was the session today?” and do a PMI (positive, minus and interesting). The feedback sometimes surprises me and is vital in how I can
forward plan (Findlay, 2008) and teach the next sessions. The students
appreciate the fact that I ask them for feedback and value their ideas.
Core values and principles that underpin my
profession
The Teaching standards:
https://educationcouncil.org.nz/sites/default/files/gts-poster.pdf in particular standard 3: understanding contextual factors; students cultural needs and the influences.
The 'values' that are developed by each school that have connections to the NZC by embedding these during technology sessions. Students understand their school's values and relationships with students are developed by using their own values.
The Teaching standards:
https://educationcouncil.org.nz/sites/default/files/gts-poster.pdf in particular standard 3: understanding contextual factors; students cultural needs and the influences.
The 'values' that are developed by each school that have connections to the NZC by embedding these during technology sessions. Students understand their school's values and relationships with students are developed by using their own values.
The principles from the curriculum
document (MOE, 2007) – they are all important I have just highlighted these:
Coherence- we
gather as much information about students to provide a ‘big picture’ to support
their individual learning needs. Sessions are differentiated to provide extra
supports or independent learning depending on the students learning needs.
Individual learning plans are also developed to provide student success and
information is provided to the contributing schools, so they can have an input.
The student learning information is passed between the technology teachers to
ensure that students are provided with easy transition between the technology
areas and to also encourage progression.
Inclusiveness – Each of our students’ groups is a ‘team’.
Every team member has the right to be respected and have opportunities to
learn. We have ‘circle time’ at the start of the session to encourage this and
at the end as a reflection. Students are encouraged to support each other
(tuakana/teina). We collaborate as a team using a ‘rights and responsibility’
agreement at the start of the term to build positive relationships and for the
students to understand their responsibilities.
Learning to learn – I encourage students to be independent and
think for themselves. The key is for them to problem solve and discover
solutions by trial and collaboration with peers. The learning experience is
much more valuable and they feel proud of their achievements. It is awkward as
a teacher to step back sometimes and allow for this to happen, it is so easy to
‘fix’ the problem. They often explain that they actually enjoyed the experience
and learnt more. It is essential for students in their journey of ‘lifelong
learning’ (Findlay, 2008).
High expectations – I have high expectations of students and
sometimes this is challenging. Some students are often nervous and anxious when
they initially use the equipment. I know that they can overcome their feelings,
but this does take some encouragement. It is often knowing when to let go of
the training wheels and walk away, so they can go solo and feel that they are
in control and gain the confidence they need. Some students need extra
scaffolding to complete learning outcomes, but the expectation is that they
will need to ‘give it a go’. Students that can achieve greater levels are
encouraged to self-assess their learning and asked: What could they do
differently?
References
Finlay, L.
(2009) Reflecting on reflective practice. PBPL. Retrieved fromhttp://www.open.ac.uk/opencetl/files/opencetl/file/ecms/web-content/Finlay-%282008%29-Reflecting-on-reflective-practice-PBPL-paper-52.pdf
Ministry of
Education (2009) Principles. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Principles
Wenger, E.,
McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice: A
Guide to Managing Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your blog post and can really relate with lots of what you are saying about collaboration, particularly learning from mistakes. Isn't it interesting that we so often tell our students to have a growth mindset and see failure or challenges positive, yet sometimes it is hard to do ourselves! As a team, we too share our ups and downs, and I think this makes us a much stronger team. I think I could follow your lead more and ask there students for more feedback and use this to react positively on their future experiences. All the best for the rest of the course, keep up the good work! http://carolynatmarshland.weebly.com/
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing your blog. I can relate to you as I am a Technology teacher as well. The last community of practice I belonged to was similar to yours. I also taught learners from contributing schools. You have described this as - sense of ‘joint enterprise’ (Wenger, 2000). You explain well how the values from the students contributing school needs to be taken into consideration. I can also understand the challenges we have as Technology teachers who have to "fit into" how the contributing schools want their students to be taught. I appreciate that your main contribution within your community of Practice is your students. Getting feedback from your students is vital as it grows and develops you further. Likewise I seek feedback from my students and use this for further development. I have enjoyed reading your thoughts.
ReplyDelete